FLT就SKIDROW修正补丁一事的回应——开喷的前兆？
FLT：SKIDROW在他所谓的‘修正补丁’里说我们的补丁会导致游戏崩溃，这是血口喷人！
我们在7台不同配置、系统的电脑上做了实验：用我们的补丁运行游戏给人一种体验原版的错觉，而用了SK的补丁，有两台压根就不能启动游戏，在三台机器上确实有大概5帧的FPS提升，但是这种随便开个后台程序就能酿成的后果，显然不能成为发布修正补丁的理由！
SKIDROW的免DVD造成游戏性能下降的传统由来已久，前不久的《黑暗之眼：桑缇娜夫的羁绊》这款游戏，RELOADED就针对他们的这一恶习发布了修正补丁：
-不跳开场进入菜单时间对比 = 47s vs 28s
-跳开场进入菜单时间对比 = 38s vs 19s
-载入新游戏时间对比 = 16s vs 10s
效果反差真是令人咂舌，像这样的情况，才称得上是一款真正意义上的修正补丁！而SKIDROW的补丁甚至比原版的时间更长，更令人发齿的事，在如此铁一般的事实面前，他们依旧矢口否认。
我们非常谦虚谨慎地接受正确的意见和修正
，如果你们要指责我们的补丁有何不妥之处，也请提出确实的证据而不是人云亦云。
另外，别忘了我们还有两台机器不能用你们的补丁运行游戏，赶紧出个补丁修正一下吧。/TEAM FAiRLIGHT ▄▄▄████▄▄▄ ▄▄▄█ ▄████████████████▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄██████████▀▀▀████████████████████████████ ███▀ ▀▀██████████████████████▀ ██ ▄█▄ ▀▀██████████████▀▀█ ▀█▌ ▄█ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▄▄ ▄█▀▄▄███ ▄ ▄█ ▄ ▄█ ▄█ ▀▀▀ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ ▄██ ▄███▄██ ▄███ ▄███ ▄▄████▄████████▀ ▀ ███ ▀ ███ ▄███ ▄▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄ ▄█ ▄█ ▄█▄▀██ ▄█ ▄▄▄ ███▄▄ ████████▄ ▄▄████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄█ ▄███ ▄████▀▀█▀▄█ ▄███▄█▀ ▀█▄█ ███▄█▀██ ▀▀███▀▀█ ▄▀▀█████ ▐██ █████████ ██████ ▐██ ███ ███▀██ ███ ████ ▐██ █████████ ██████ ▐██ ███ ███ ██ ███ ▄▄████ ▐██▌███ ▄██████ ██████ ▐██▌███ ███ ██ ███ ▄▀▀█████▌ ▀██▄█▀███▀██████ ██████▀██▄████ ███ ██ ███ █████▄ ▀ ▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀ ███▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▄███▄ ████████▄▄▄ ▐██▌ANSi–JED ▐█▀██▀▄ ▄███████▀▀ ▄██▀▀█▄ ▄▄████▀▀ ▄▄███▄▄▄ ▄▄▀▀ ▀▀██▀▀▀ ▀█▀ █▀ ▀▀▀ ▀ ┌────In Their 26th Year Of Glory, FairLight Released #1038────┐ ┌┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌┘ Prototype 2 (c) Activision Blizzard ┌┘└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘┘ : Supplied by: FAIRLIGHT : : Release Date: 28/07/2012 : │ Cracked by:FAIRLIGHT │ │ Game Type: Action │ │ Packaged by: FAIRLIGHT │ │ Image Format: ISO │ ├──────────────-----──────────────────┤ ├────────────────────────────────────┤ │ DISCS: 2 DVDs │ │ Protection: Steam │ │ ────────────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────── │ │ System Requirements : (S)-1-phenylpropan-2-amine │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ SCENE NOTES:============After advanced analysis of vague claimsinPrototype.2.Proper-SKIDROW,wewant to reply with our conclusion of things. To begin, we should have a quick look at a similar situation, whereanEMUwas compared with a better rebuilded crack and lead to a proper. Thelatesttarget it happened with was The Dark Eye - Chains of Satinav. Here youhavedata to compare up against, to determine if the proper is valid or not.Examples are given like: Load to menu with intro videos = 47 vs. 28 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )Load to menu, intro vids skipped = 38 vs. 19 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )Load new game = 16 vs. 10 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )On the first view it looks overwhelming. Then when you takeacloserlookyou should asking, "How long does the original exe take in time?".Herewehave Securom as protection, what is known to slow down a game'sperformanceingeneral,withmoreprotectionfeaturesactivated,themoreofaperformance hit you might see in theory. Inouropinionagroup'scrackshould run at least as good as the original retailreleasedexedoes.Ifdevelopers find it acceptable that the user has todealwithSecuromandthe longer loading times (if any) are exceptable for them, then this isnota release group's problem.Whenwouldyouconsidertodrawtheline?Say another group found a way to make it load even quicker thanRLDsbyacouple seconds, should that be enough for a proper?GameISO groupsinthescene again are not here to improve a game's general playability with a fullrelease or fix any bugs that an update will take care of. In the case of The Dark Eye, SKIDROW's crack still misses the marktoevencompete with the original, normally such a giantic timedifferenceisnotthe norm. And still, they refused to accept the proper. This small excursion should give a first overview,onhowagoodproperreason can look. It has proof given, and can be recreated easily byanyone.But the most important thing is, that the proper crack runs as goodastheoriginal game or even better. Your crack is the opposite,slowerthantheoriginal. RELOADEDhasevenreleasedgameswithSolidshieldactivatedoffline by way of a keygen which is a valid release, the game playsexactlylike the original. RELOADED also seems to grasp theideawithCRACKONLYreleases like this, not a full 2 DVD pack because your claimistheotherexe is slower. If the gamedidnotwork,thenafullreleasecanbeneccessary. During the last few years the acceptance touse,moreorless,emulated parts in a crack was basically ignored.Soacomparisonbetweenamore emulated crack like we have in Protoype 2 and, like youclaim,acomplete rebuild of the protected game exe, is not a general reason to proper. The strange thing about your proper is, that you seem tohaveproblemstoreally prove anything you've stated. Now should it beuptotheoriginalgroup that pred the game have to debunk your accusations whennoproofisprovided? This is the job of the group wanting to release a proper, and thenstate found proof in the nfo of the proper release. You say, ourmethodtocalculate right values slows down the runtime and itCOULDleadtofalseresults or COULD crash. This is all speculation, nor even a fact withproofYOU MUST provide, not us having to provide proof of false claims. When someone has read your claims, they wouldexpectthatourgamerunslike crap and a shit storm is brewing into a completecrashofthegame.The truth is, that we again played our releaseon7differentcomputers,all with different configurations and operating systems after yourunneededproper. We were looking for any odd behavior and logging the frame ratesinvarious areas of the game. The conclusion was, that compared to the originalgame without our cracked content applied, there was no noticabledifferencein function or performance. Infact it didn't ever performslowerthantheoriginal did on any of the systems. It ran as it should forthosesystems,both cracked and uncracked. One of the results from a machine we used:Original Files:╖ Time (ms) of Test: 900000╖ FPS MIN: 37╖ FPS MAX: 57╖ FPS AVG: 45.833Our Crack Files:╖ Time (ms) of Test: 900000╖ FPS MIN: 38╖ FPS MAX: 57╖ FPS AVG: 45.850NoweveryonewascuriostoseehowSKIDROW'scrackperformed.Verydisappointing that on 2 computers, the game didnotevenstart.Itsentthe testers back to desktop with an appcrash. The restmadeit,tostart the game. So there was nothing to comparebutgeneralgameplaywithFPSand loading times. As a result there was only an increaseofabout5FPSfor threeofthetesters.Again,averymarginalresultasvariousbackground programs can slow games a lot more than this at times.Sotheseresults should be enough for a proper? A group with a recent history of doing whatever it takes togetareleaseworking is now doingpropersfor5FPSonsomemachines?Wow,thatssomething that makes you ask yourself, what were the motivestomakesuchan accusation and without providing proof, which isneededalwaysanyhow.A group that has even used unprotected exes orweakerprotectedexesandtag it as the original stronger protectioncrackednowproceedforthwithsuch and proper? Over the last yearsbasicallyanysolutionwhichwouldmake a gamestartwasacceptableforSKIDROW.Loaderswrappedinside another dll, even different versions of an exeweregoodenoughtomake arelease.Notto mention from the few but funny situations you got caughtfor"usingalternativesupplysources"andthenclaimwe don't have to explain ourselfs, only to people we believeshould(pinchself). If you think you have something to reply fromourpreviousstatementswehopeitsinformativetotherelease.Dokeepinmindthatquotingcomments from other sources (public web forums and whatnot),thatthisis not an acceptable form of proof, it should bestrictlyyourown.Weare open for qualified properreasonsandwillbeacceptedwhenproofis provided that can be recreated in such cases inwhichtheyarerequired. Also your crack needs some addressing as it still is not working ontwoof our systems. /TEAM FAiRLIGHT┌┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌┘ +-+QUALITY, TRADITIONAND PRIDE +-+ ┌┘ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘924e461726d984a678301222f2c1a81b
页:
[1]