对于Skidrow在虐2的破解nfo文件里面对Fairlight的嘲讽～FLT竟然在Scence里单开发布反击了～～～～
由于涉及到比较专业的 破姐姿势 破解知识～所以就不翻译全文了～有性趣的童鞋请自行审阅
嘛～简单的概括～基本上就是说～F组也好R组也好～做破解的底线是还原未破解的运行状态～就算不能提升执行效能至少不会拖慢而SR为了能进游戏不折手断～用半裸甚至是全裸的重建exe作为破解还恬不知耻的标明为未扒衣exe破解～同时还用这个来耻笑那些不修改执行文件保护仅使用模拟方式绕过验证的破解组～
然后就是对比模拟破解和重建破解的执行效率～然后就是吐槽S组的破解严重拖慢的游戏～让游戏更卡顿之类的云云～
然后么就是说什么S组都是在无端的控诉而没有任何证据～而且还自己打自己的脸之类的....
PS～在他们进行虐2破解对比的时候～FLT破解的执行效率可以说完全和未破解相同～甚至略有提升～而S组的破解～7台电脑里2台跳出3台共快5帧还有2台么......
然后补一句万能的话：由于时间仓促及译者水平有限，如有不足还请不吝赐教....
LZ按：嘛～执行效率什么的LZ不清楚～毕竟LZ为了 不让我的570过热 响应国家节能减排号召，为保护环境节约资源做贡献而强开垂直同步的～反正两组都能进游戏～S组有DLC～
如果真如FLT说的SR的破解会拖慢游戏的话...要帧数还是要DLC呢.....
附：nfo原文
▄▄▄████▄▄▄ ▄▄▄█
▄████████████████▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄█████
█████▀▀▀████████████████████████████
███▀ ▀▀██████████████████████▀
██ ▄█▄ ▀▀██████████████▀▀
█ ▀█▌ ▄█ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▄▄ ▄█▀▄▄███ ▄ ▄█ ▄ ▄█ ▄█
▀▀▀ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ ▄██ ▄███▄██ ▄███ ▄███
▄▄████▄████████▀ ▀ ███ ▀ ███ ▄███
▄▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄ ▄█ ▄█ ▄█▄▀██ ▄█ ▄▄▄ ███▄▄ ████████▄
▄▄████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄█ ▄███ ▄████▀▀█▀▄█ ▄███▄█▀ ▀█▄█ ███▄█▀██ ▀▀███▀▀█
▄▀▀█████ ▐██ █████████ ██████ ▐██ ███ ███▀██ ███
████ ▐██ █████████ ██████ ▐██ ███ ███ ██ ███
▄▄████ ▐██▌███ ▄██████ ██████ ▐██▌███ ███ ██ ███
▄▀▀█████▌ ▀██▄█▀███▀██████ ██████▀██▄████ ███ ██ ███
█████▄ ▀ ▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀ ███▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀
▄███▄ ████████▄▄▄ ▐██▌ANSi–JED
▐█▀██▀▄ ▄███████▀▀ ▄██▀
▀█▄ ▄▄████▀▀ ▄▄███▄▄▄ ▄▄▀▀
▀▀██▀▀▀ ▀█▀ █▀ ▀▀▀
▀
┌────In Their 26th Year Of Glory, FairLight Released #1038────┐
┌┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
┌┘ Prototype 2 (c) Activision Blizzard ┌┘
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘┘
: Supplied by: FAIRLIGHT : : Release Date: 28/07/2012 :
│ Cracked by:FAIRLIGHT │ │ Game Type: Action │
│ Packaged by: FAIRLIGHT │ │ Image Format: ISO │
├──────────────-----──────────────────┤ ├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DISCS: 2 DVDs │ │ Protection: Steam │
│ ────────────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────── │
│ System Requirements : (S)-1-phenylpropan-2-amine │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
SCENE NOTES:
============
After advanced analysis of vague claimsinPrototype.2.Proper-SKIDROW,we
want to reply with our conclusion of things.
To begin, we should have a quick look at a similar situation, whereanEMU
was compared with a better rebuilded crack and lead to a proper. Thelatest
target it happened with was The Dark Eye - Chains of Satinav. Here youhave
data to compare up against, to determine if the proper is valid or not.
Examples are given like:
Load to menu with intro videos = 47 vs. 28 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )
Load to menu, intro vids skipped = 38 vs. 19 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )
Load new game = 16 vs. 10 seconds ( SR vs. RLD )
On the first view it looks overwhelming. Then when you takeacloserlook
you should asking, "How long does the original exe take in time?".Herewe
have Securom as protection, what is known to slow down a game'sperformance
ingeneral,withmoreprotectionfeaturesactivated,themoreofa
performance hit you might see in theory. Inouropinionagroup'scrack
should run at least as good as the original retailreleasedexedoes.If
developers find it acceptable that the user has todealwithSecuromand
the longer loading times (if any) are exceptable for them, then this isnot
a release group's problem.Whenwouldyouconsidertodrawtheline?
Say another group found a way to make it load even quicker thanRLDsbya
couple seconds, should that be enough for a proper?GameISO groupsinthe
scene again are not here to improve a game's general playability with a full
release or fix any bugs that an update will take care of.
In the case of The Dark Eye, SKIDROW's crack still misses the marktoeven
compete with the original, normally such a giantic timedifferenceisnot
the norm. And still, they refused to accept the proper.
This small excursion should give a first overview,onhowagoodproper
reason can look. It has proof given, and can be recreated easily byanyone.
But the most important thing is, that the proper crack runs as goodasthe
original game or even better. Your crack is the opposite,slowerthanthe
original. RELOADEDhasevenreleasedgameswithSolidshieldactivated
offline by way of a keygen which is a valid release, the game playsexactly
like the original. RELOADED also seems to grasp theideawithCRACKONLY
releases like this, not a full 2 DVD pack because your claimistheother
exe is slower. If the gamedidnotwork,thenafullreleasecanbe
neccessary.
During the last few years the acceptance touse,moreorless,emulated
parts in a crack was basically ignored.Soacomparisonbetweenamore
emulated crack like we have in Protoype 2 and, like youclaim,acomplete
rebuild of the protected game exe, is not a general reason to proper.
The strange thing about your proper is, that you seem tohaveproblemsto
really prove anything you've stated. Now should it beuptotheoriginal
group that pred the game have to debunk your accusations whennoproofis
provided? This is the job of the group wanting to release a proper, and then
state found proof in the nfo of the proper release. You say, ourmethodto
calculate right values slows down the runtime and itCOULDleadtofalse
results or COULD crash. This is all speculation, nor even a fact withproof
YOU MUST provide, not us having to provide proof of false claims.
When someone has read your claims, they wouldexpectthatourgameruns
like crap and a shit storm is brewing into a completecrashofthegame.
The truth is, that we again played our releaseon7differentcomputers,
all with different configurations and operating systems after yourunneeded
proper. We were looking for any odd behavior and logging the frame ratesin
various areas of the game. The conclusion was, that compared to the original
game without our cracked content applied, there was no noticabledifference
in function or performance. Infact it didn't ever performslowerthanthe
original did on any of the systems. It ran as it should forthosesystems,
both cracked and uncracked. One of the results from a machine we used:
Original Files:
╖ Time (ms) of Test: 900000
╖ FPS MIN: 37
╖ FPS MAX: 57
╖ FPS AVG: 45.833
Our Crack Files:
╖ Time (ms) of Test: 900000
╖ FPS MIN: 38
╖ FPS MAX: 57
╖ FPS AVG: 45.850
NoweveryonewascuriostoseehowSKIDROW'scrackperformed.Very
disappointing that on 2 computers, the game didnotevenstart.Itsent
the testers back to desktop with an appcrash. The restmadeit,tostart
the game. So there was nothing to comparebutgeneralgameplaywithFPS
and loading times. As a result there was only an increaseofabout5FPS
for threeofthetesters.Again,averymarginalresultasvarious
background programs can slow games a lot more than this at times.Sothese
results should be enough for a proper?
A group with a recent history of doing whatever it takes togetarelease
working is now doingpropersfor5FPSonsomemachines?Wow,thats
something that makes you ask yourself, what were the motivestomakesuch
an accusation and without providing proof, which isneededalwaysanyhow.
A group that has even used unprotected exes orweakerprotectedexesand
tag it as the original stronger protectioncrackednowproceedforthwith
such and proper? Over the last yearsbasicallyanysolutionwhichwould
make a gamestartwasacceptableforSKIDROW.Loaderswrappedinside
another dll, even different versions of an exeweregoodenoughtomake
arelease.Notto mention from the few but funny situations
you got caughtfor"usingalternativesupplysources"andthenclaim
we don't have to explain ourselfs, only to people we believeshould(pinch
self).
If you think you have something to reply fromourpreviousstatementswe
hopeitsinformativetotherelease.Dokeepinmindthatquoting
comments from other sources (public web forums and whatnot),thatthisis
not an acceptable form of proof, it should bestrictlyyourown.Weare
open for qualified properreasonsandwillbeacceptedwhenproofis
provided that can be recreated in such cases inwhichtheyarerequired.
Also your crack needs some addressing as it still is not working ontwoof
our systems.
/TEAM FAiRLIGHT
┌┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
┌┘ +-+QUALITY, TRADITIONAND PRIDE +-+ ┌┘┘
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
924e461726d984a678301222f2c1a81b
flt
的不是说用dlc吗
页:
[1]